You are not logged in or registered. Please login or register to use the full functionality of this board...

Post Reply 
RMW 30-94 Rotrex kit (front mount)
06-28-2011, 04:42 PM (This post was last modified: 06-28-2011 04:46 PM by eurowned.)
Post: #51
RE: RMW 30-94 Rotrex kit (front mount)
Dick's car is so slow in comparison to how it sounds.

If you have an AiM MXL digital dash like Jan and I, you only need one and its right in front of you and has datalogging capability. It doesn't just stop there it gets so much better if you have the GPS module you can datalog down to the foot as to how your car is running at any point of the track or road. Absolutely no clusterfuck of gauges can allow you to do that. Gets even better if you have a standalone like Jan's setup which would have to be the PERFECT setup if you are going full retard on the car.

Mynes Fucked.....Is yours?
[Image: sig.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-28-2011, 05:52 PM
Post: #52
RE: RMW 30-94 Rotrex kit (front mount)
(06-28-2011 04:42 PM)eurowned Wrote:  Dick's car is so slow in comparison to how it sounds.

If you have an AiM MXL digital dash like Jan and I, you only need one and its right in front of you and has datalogging capability. It doesn't just stop there it gets so much better if you have the GPS module you can datalog down to the foot as to how your car is running at any point of the track or road. Absolutely no clusterfuck of gauges can allow you to do that. Gets even better if you have a standalone like Jan's setup which would have to be the PERFECT setup if you are going full retard on the car.


I think right after Murphy's law comes the Inverse Law of Gauges, which states simply that "The Lap time of a given car is inversely proportional to the number of gauges attached to the dashboard, A-Pillar, or anywhere in the line of sight of the driver."


*Corollary #1: Anyone with more than 5 visible gauges is more likely than not to be running infinite lap times (or in other words, the car will never see the track).

*Corollary #2: Anyone with more than 8 visible gauges is obviously compensating for something (And corollary #1 still applies).

The only good F56 is a dead F56
[Image: 11018065_10206797715411844_6674805954892472119_n.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-28-2011, 08:31 PM
Post: #53
RE: RMW 30-94 Rotrex kit (front mount)
(06-28-2011 04:42 PM)eurowned Wrote:  Dick's car is so slow in comparison to how it sounds.

If you have an AiM MXL digital dash like Jan and I, you only need one and its right in front of you and has datalogging capability. It doesn't just stop there it gets so much better if you have the GPS module you can datalog down to the foot as to how your car is running at any point of the track or road. Absolutely no clusterfuck of gauges can allow you to do that. Gets even better if you have a standalone like Jan's setup which would have to be the PERFECT setup if you are going full retard on the car.

you are 100% correct these guys think having multiple gauges is the ticket, having an ecu that will datalog everything and having one simple system that will warn you before something goes wrong like the AIM is light years better. Trying to convince these guys of this is near impossible. What they spent on gauges they could have put an AIM system in.....

the thing that gets me is the amount of time he has spent trying .......... to tune his car. With our stand alone which has REAL FULL ACCESS he could have tuned it from one of our base maps in an hr in real time. No guessing about which cell it's in........no having to clear adaptations........ no lean spots because you can't dump enough acceleration fuel in......... no limp modes...........car will run better and faster the first time........
I can go on and on.......but I'm sure everyone gets the drift.......

You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity

"Tuning Matters"

minimark Wrote:
....as silent as a freshly fallen snow on a crisp winter morning, a deafening hush falls across the land of Kool-Aid.....

[Image: 76V0TaO.png?1]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-29-2011, 12:31 AM
Post: #54
RE: RMW 30-94 Rotrex kit (front mount)
I feel like this thread has gone more than mildly off topic...

[Image: tumblr_m1rdjx4Vwg1qzkikho1_250.gif]
“Have you ever noticed how some people never
have the money to do it right, but can always
find the money to do it twice ?”
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-29-2011, 07:45 AM
Post: #55
RE: RMW 30-94 Rotrex kit (front mount)
Well, then it's going through it 's natural evolution to catch up with the other MINI forums...Smile

On an unrelated note, roughly how much does the AIM setup cost?

The only good F56 is a dead F56
[Image: 11018065_10206797715411844_6674805954892472119_n.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-29-2011, 04:52 PM
Post: #56
RE: RMW 30-94 Rotrex kit (front mount)
Creating a thread in R53 modifications for the AiM MXL system.

Mynes Fucked.....Is yours?
[Image: sig.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-29-2011, 07:42 PM
Post: #57
RE: RMW 30-94 Rotrex kit (front mount)
I am so waiting for the standalone to come to fruition.

(06-28-2011 08:31 PM)Jan Wrote:  
(06-28-2011 04:42 PM)eurowned Wrote:  Dick's car is so slow in comparison to how it sounds.

If you have an AiM MXL digital dash like Jan and I, you only need one and its right in front of you and has datalogging capability. It doesn't just stop there it gets so much better if you have the GPS module you can datalog down to the foot as to how your car is running at any point of the track or road. Absolutely no clusterfuck of gauges can allow you to do that. Gets even better if you have a standalone like Jan's setup which would have to be the PERFECT setup if you are going full retard on the car.

you are 100% correct these guys think having multiple gauges is the ticket, having an ecu that will datalog everything and having one simple system that will warn you before something goes wrong like the AIM is light years better. Trying to convince these guys of this is near impossible. What they spent on gauges they could have put an AIM system in.....

the thing that gets me is the amount of time he has spent trying .......... to tune his car. With our stand alone which has REAL FULL ACCESS he could have tuned it from one of our base maps in an hr in real time. No guessing about which cell it's in........no having to clear adaptations........ no lean spots because you can't dump enough acceleration fuel in......... no limp modes...........car will run better and faster the first time........
I can go on and on.......but I'm sure everyone gets the drift.......

[Image: tumblr_ma3itsNZBE1reafr3o1_250.gif]


I swear some people on this forum are too dumb to own a MINI.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-30-2011, 01:44 AM
Post: #58
RE: RMW 30-94 Rotrex kit (front mount)
You and me both.

[Image: tumblr_m1rdjx4Vwg1qzkikho1_250.gif]
“Have you ever noticed how some people never
have the money to do it right, but can always
find the money to do it twice ?”
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-30-2011, 01:57 AM
Post: #59
RE: RMW 30-94 Rotrex kit (front mount)
[Image: 2011-06-24_17-16-56_222.jpg]


Its Official were going full blown Retard. This is what has gone into the GP for testing.....
And now heres some pictures of the airbox you saw earlier after i wrapped it in some gold tape to reflect heat.

[Image: 2011-06-28_22-53-25_866.jpg]

[Image: 2011-06-28_22-53-36_404.jpg]


And Owen came by to add this....
[Image: 2011-06-22_14-04-50_510.jpg]

[Image: tumblr_m1rdjx4Vwg1qzkikho1_250.gif]
“Have you ever noticed how some people never
have the money to do it right, but can always
find the money to do it twice ?”
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-30-2011, 02:03 AM
Post: #60
RE: RMW 30-94 Rotrex kit (front mount)
That is looking AWESOME!!!

[Image: dBzlY66.jpg?1]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 45 Guest(s)