C38...........is it possible?
|
06-24-2012, 03:50 PM
Post: #191
|
|||
|
|||
C38...........is it possible?
Haha....... Will need to invest in some 949's and wider rubber!
Will see how the A050's go first.... Or how long they last Supporting RMW from 15015kms away.......... |
|||
06-25-2012, 10:23 AM
Post: #192
|
|||
|
|||
RE: C38...........is it possible? | |||
06-25-2012, 10:26 AM
Post: #193
|
|||
|
|||
RE: C38...........is it possible?
yeah, its quite funny.......
You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity "Tuning Matters" minimark Wrote: ....as silent as a freshly fallen snow on a crisp winter morning, a deafening hush falls across the land of Kool-Aid..... |
|||
06-25-2012, 02:22 PM
Post: #194
|
|||
|
|||
RE: C38...........is it possible?
(06-24-2012 12:05 PM)colingreene Wrote: ^ WUT. Yep, I've built a K24 (honda motor) and doing many shifts over about 8k will wear it out rapidly. The long stroke pushes the piston speeds well up and beyond E46 M3 pistons speeds (which already about as far as you want to go). Even the S2000 2.2L wore out cylinder 4 in a couple seasons of racing shifting at 8600rpm. I was told I could spin it to 9500 or 10k if I had the cam in there to flow air up there, but only for a drag pass or two. |
|||
06-25-2012, 02:42 PM
Post: #195
|
|||
|
|||
RE: C38...........is it possible?
Piston's speeds is definitely one of the RPM is a Killer dependents.
Mynes Fucked.....Is yours?
|
|||
06-25-2012, 05:37 PM
Post: #196
|
|||
|
|||
RE: C38...........is it possible?
So what's the maximum recomended RPM with the stroker crank? (Either 1.7 or 1.8)
Just curious... Might be going to a 1.7 for the little extra TQ... I need a crank anyhow. Easily agitated, Half way retarded, and mentally unstable... Cant put up with it? SUCK MY RICHARD!! |
|||
06-25-2012, 05:41 PM
Post: #197
|
|||
|
|||
Re: RE: C38...........is it possible?
[quote='Canyon Factory' pid='27535' dateline='1340667474']
So what's the maximum recomended RPM with the stroker crank? (Either 1.7 or 1.8) Just curious... Might be going to a 1.7 for the little extra TQ... I need a crank anyhow. Are you about to start rebuilding?! |
|||
06-25-2012, 05:44 PM
Post: #198
|
|||
|
|||
RE: C38...........is it possible?
(06-25-2012 05:41 PM)minimark Wrote: [quote='Canyon Factory' pid='27535' dateline='1340667474'] Nope just getting more serious with the planning now that I have money left after paying my bills. Easily agitated, Half way retarded, and mentally unstable... Cant put up with it? SUCK MY RICHARD!! |
|||
06-25-2012, 05:45 PM
Post: #199
|
|||
|
|||
RE: C38...........is it possible?
8k is NOT an issue............with mechanical rockers 8500+
You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity "Tuning Matters" minimark Wrote: ....as silent as a freshly fallen snow on a crisp winter morning, a deafening hush falls across the land of Kool-Aid..... |
|||
06-25-2012, 05:48 PM
Post: #200
|
|||
|
|||
RE: C38...........is it possible?
(06-25-2012 05:45 PM)Jan Wrote: 8k is NOT an issue............with mechanical rockers 8500+ I really dont want to go much over 7000 so I guess that works out well. Easily agitated, Half way retarded, and mentally unstable... Cant put up with it? SUCK MY RICHARD!! |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)